Scheme language standardization process
Andy Wingo scripsit: > I don't think that this is the case for module-level bindings, unless > something has changed. Such an optimization would be incorrect if the X > binding could be mutated. It's an error to mutate an imported binding. This legitimizes the things compilers have always done with car, cdr, etc. -- Híggledy-pìggledy / XML programmers John Cowan Try to escape those / I-eighteen-N woes; http://www.ccil.org/~cowan Incontrovertibly / What we need more of is cowan@x Unicode weenies and / François Yergeaus. _______________________________________________ Scheme-reports mailing list Scheme-reports@x http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports