Scheme language standardization process
On Mon, 23 May 2011 12:02:05 -0400, Manuel Simoni <msimoni@x> wrote: > It's a quite hairy and integral part of the expansion process, and as > such I have the feeling that it should be specified in WG1, even if > WG1 itself has no procedural macros. I don't think it is on the list, and I doubt that we can address it. This is much more likely to be in the purview of WG2. I have hinted at a form like this for WG2 called "meta." Aaron W. Hsu -- Programming is just another word for the lost art of thinking. _______________________________________________ Scheme-reports mailing list Scheme-reports@x http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports