Scheme language standardization process
On 2011-01-22, at 17:04, Vincent Manis wrote: > If I have syntax-case or some other macro system, I can write a macro > > (in-floating-point > (/ (+ (- b) (sqrt discriminant)) (* 2.0 a))) > > that does the renaming inside the form. I would argue that this is clearer, and allows flonum arithmetic to coexist in the same piece of code with fixnum or generic arithmetic. It definitely beats renaming. What was I thinking? syntax-rules is good enough. -- vincent _______________________________________________ Scheme-reports mailing list Scheme-reports@x http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports