Scheme language standardization process
On Sat, 16 Apr 2011 04:53:26 -0400, OKUMURA Yuki <mjt@x> wrote: > Source expansion/evaluation is same for? For example: > #0=(define a . #0#) > should be treated as a syntax error? or R7RS allows implementation can > took infinite time for expand this > form? Are you asking whether expansion should be terminating? I do not believe any standard after or including R5RS had terminating expansion semantics, since macros may recur forever. Aaron W. Hsu -- Programming is just another word for the lost art of thinking. _______________________________________________ Scheme-reports mailing list Scheme-reports@x http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports