Scheme language standardization process
On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 5:34 PM, Alaric Snell-Pym <alaric@x> wrote: > > On 09/29/2011 05:25 PM, Andre van Tonder wrote: > >> On a system that that invokes a compiler on the argument of EVAL, the compiler >> may depend on the textual representation of the code '(cons 1 2). It may even >> do certain optimizations and rewritings based on the textual representation. >> Again, having procedure objects in here confuses levels and can cause problems >> for such a compiler. > > Does it really? Can anyone point to an implementation of EVAL that can't > cope with this? Chicken's inline egg would not support this. That's intended for inline C code, but could be modified and used as an EVAL replacement. -- Alex _______________________________________________ Scheme-reports mailing list Scheme-reports@x http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports