Scheme language standardization process
On Wed 27 Apr 2011 09:38, "Aaron W. Hsu" <arcfide@x> writes: > On Mon, 25 Apr 2011 01:16:03 -0400, John Cowan <cowan@x> > wrote: > >> MODULE is not a Scheme syntax >> keyword; you can only bring in MODULEs using IMPORT. > > I find this annoying, as it means that at the top-level REPL, we can't > define new modules by entering them on the REPL; or, do I misunderstand > this thread? I also find it annoying, but perhaps this is simply a common extension that implementations can provide. Andy -- http://wingolog.org/ _______________________________________________ Scheme-reports mailing list Scheme-reports@x http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports