Scheme language standardization process
On 05/19/2011 12:50 PM, Emmanuel Medernach wrote: > PS: For me the real problem is elsewhere: I really dislike to have a > value which is an unspecified one, I prefer instead that implementations > return nothing - as in (values) In Kawa set! returns no values. I think this makes the REPL nicer: set!, define, and similar forms return no values, which prints out as nothing. -- --Per Bothner per@x http://per.bothner.com/ _______________________________________________ Scheme-reports mailing list Scheme-reports@x http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports