Scheme language standardization process
On Sun 06 Jan 2013 07:55, Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x> writes: > I would change the "Incompatibilities with R6RS" to "Differences > from > R6RS", and be a lot less snarky and defensive. > > My preference is to remove the entire section about R6RS. > It's the job of the small language to be compatible of R5RS, > and the job of the large language to be compatible with R6RS, > so this entire section belongs in the WG2 report. FWIW, I agree with you. Andy -- http://wingolog.org/ _______________________________________________ Scheme-reports mailing list Scheme-reports@x http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports