Scheme language standardization process
Daniel Villeneuve scripsit: > Apologies: I somehow managed to completely miss that the output was > in the text, wrongly inferring that the two "unspecified" results > meant that the value of (= 1 1.0) was implementation-defined. No problem. It's better to use consistent formatting in the "and prints" style. -- A rose by any other name John Cowan may smell as sweet, http://www.ccil.org/~cowan but if you called it an onion cowan@x you'd get cooks very confused. --RMS _______________________________________________ Scheme-reports mailing list Scheme-reports@x http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports