Scheme language standardization process
On 05/25/2013 07:18 PM, John Cowan wrote: > It's efficient, but it breaks the abstraction of a container with N > objects in it and without order. Which brings us back to my original question: Is this abstraction sufficiently useful to justify its existence as part of the standard library of a general-purpose programming language? To me the answer seems clear. -- --Per Bothner per@x http://per.bothner.com/ _______________________________________________ Scheme-reports mailing list Scheme-reports@x http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports