Scheme language standardization process
On Sun, Oct 16, 2011 at 11:44 PM, Jussi Piitulainen <jpiitula@x> wrote: > > Do all these need to remain in the language? In (scheme base)? We should put them somewhere for compatibility, but I definitely think everything but the one and two depth combinations should be removed from (scheme base). Their use is generally a code smell. People should use destructuring, records, or SRFI-1 first..tenth accessors. -- Alex _______________________________________________ Scheme-reports mailing list Scheme-reports@x http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports