Scheme language standardization process
Aaron W. Hsu scripsit: > *sigh* It appears that you are right here. On the other hand, I would > argue that you can't possibly justify a symbolic semantics here because of > this very situation: it's just incorrect. SRFI 9 indeed speaks of identifiers throughout, never of symbols. -- John Cowan http://www.ccil.org/~cowan cowan@x Uneasy lies the head that wears the Editor's hat! --Eddie Foirbeis Climo _______________________________________________ Scheme-reports mailing list Scheme-reports@x http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports