Scheme language standardization process
On Fri, Dec 24, 2010 at 9:18 AM, Andre van Tonder <andre@x> wrote: > > After years of using Scheme, I have probably encountered LOOP less than 5 times > in someone else's code. Every time I had to go look it up in the standard to > try to figure out what it means. In my opinion, LOOP code is not readable code. I don't think anyone has any intention of proposing the CL loop. More likely would be Shiver's loop or foof-loop (http://mumble.net/~campbell/scheme/foof-loop.txt). -- Alex _______________________________________________ Scheme-reports mailing list Scheme-reports@x http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports