Scheme language standardization process
On Wed 03 Aug 2011 20:44, Per Bothner <per@x> writes: > The precedent is R6RS. > Existing implementations, including Kawa, implement this syntax. > A change in this would be pointless churn - no action is needed. Agreed, FWIW. Andy -- http://wingolog.org/ _______________________________________________ Scheme-reports mailing list Scheme-reports@x http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports