Scheme language standardization process
On Sat, 16 Apr 2011 08:35:53 -0400, Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x> wrote: > As you say, there is no "=>" bound in (scheme base). > So long as it's not bound in the usage context it will > thus work with `cond'. I forget, has the ramifications of this to the REPL semantics been discussed? Some Schemes specifically treat all identifiers as implicitly bound at the top-level in the REPL, which makes implicit auxiliary keywords fail at the REPL, though they still work inside of libraries. Aaron W. Hsu -- Programming is just another word for the lost art of thinking. _______________________________________________ Scheme-reports mailing list Scheme-reports@x http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports