Scheme language standardization process
On Tue, 14 May 2013, Andy Wingo <wingo@x> wrote: > On Mon 13 May 2013 13:59, John Cowan <cowan@x> writes: > >> I have transmuted all the objections and complaints raised >> in the ballots (and a few associated emails) received >> so far into Trac tickets to be considered by WG1 after the >> plebiscite is complete. Indexes to these tickets can be found at >> <http://trac.sacrideo.us/wg/wiki/PlebisciteObjections>. There is a list >> of tickets by name and number, linked to the actual ticket by the number, >> and there is also an author index specifying tickets filed in response >> to the ballot of a specific author. I have added my own comments to all >> tickets, and encourage WG1 members to do this same; I will add comments >> by others on request, subject to my (hopefully) sound discretion. > > What is the purpose of this endeavor? > > It seems that some of my comments on my ratification vote have been > turned into action items. For whom? Some concerns are fairly > represented in the tickets. About half of them are not. All have been > discussed on the list at great length in the past. > > Andy I found the collection of these in this different form useful, even though we already have the mailing list archives. oo--JS. > -- > http://wingolog.org/ _______________________________________________ Scheme-reports mailing list Scheme-reports@x http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports