Scheme language standardization process
On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 8:24 AM, Helmut Eller <eller.helmut@x> wrote: > You could use the sequence (a c d b) i.e. evaluate the test of the cond > clause in the dynamic environment of raise and unwind the stack only > when the test returns true. That's arguably "better" as this will call > other handlers in the correct environment if the test returns #f. While it seems intuitive, I prefer the behavior as described by Aaron for full continuations. The only difference being in IronScheme, that cannot re-raise in the original caller's extent. I would also like to point out the behavior (at least for R6RS) when the clause returns #t, the result is (a b c d). This is the same for full continuations or just using escape continuations as in IronScheme. Cheers leppie _______________________________________________ Scheme-reports mailing list Scheme-reports@x http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports