Scheme language standardization process
On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 12:51 AM, Jussi Piitulainen <jpiitula@x> wrote: > May I point out that this last one is now a non-argument. "@" was > already freed and can be used in symbols and identifiers. Perhaps it is a mistake, but the "@" syntax is in the formal grammar for complex numbers in the R7RS draft. Or perhaps you mean you're still able to use "@" despite it being specified for complex number construction. -Robert Smith _______________________________________________ Scheme-reports mailing list Scheme-reports@x http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports