Scheme language standardization process
The current wording can be read a bit wider than requiring labels on circular objects; that is, it can be read as display must terminate on any objects (even if the object is implementation's extension), which concerns me. If I can read it that the behavior only describes on the domain of r7rs, I'm ok with it. On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 9:33 PM, John Cowan <cowan@x> wrote: > Aaron W. Hsu scripsit: > >> Did we actually vote to make display terminating? > > Ticket #388, ballot 6. You voted to leave the behavior unspecified, as > did Art Gleckler, but all other votes were in favor of requiring labels. > > -- > John Cowan <cowan@x> http://www.ccil.org/~cowan > Raffiniert ist der Herrgott, aber boshaft ist er nicht. > --Albert Einstein > > _______________________________________________ > Scheme-reports mailing list > Scheme-reports@x > http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports _______________________________________________ Scheme-reports mailing list Scheme-reports@x http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports