Scheme language standardization process
Alex Shinn scripsit: > I think this reasoning is flawed. If we believe the names > [exact->inexact and inexact->exact] are bad, and that R6RS fixed the > names, we should go with R6RS, not write an apology. That would break backward compatibility with IEEE Scheme, a constraint which did not apply to the R6RS work but is effectively imposed on WG1 by its charter. I would be extremely reluctant to go there. -- What is the sound of Perl? Is it not the John Cowan sound of a [Ww]all that people have stopped cowan@x banging their head against? --Larry http://www.ccil.org/~cowan _______________________________________________ Scheme-reports mailing list Scheme-reports@x http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports