Scheme language standardization process
Jussi Piitulainen scripsit: > > Finally, in many places where a function is described the report > > first says "it is an error if [...]" and only then describes what > > the function does. Can we reverse this order? > > Seconded. From what I remember in the draft that I last read - which > is not the current draft - some of the "it is an error if" statements > could be removed, since the type of the argument is already specified > unobtrusively by the argument name in the entry head. I've changed most of these around, though unfortunately not in time for draft 6. They will be in draft 7, however. -- Real FORTRAN programmers can program FORTRAN John Cowan in any language. --Ed Post cowan@x _______________________________________________ Scheme-reports mailing list Scheme-reports@x http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports