Re: [Scheme-reports] organizational comment regarding modules

[John Cowan <cowan@x>]

Andy Wingo scripsit:

>   (2) at least beyond wg1 you are definitely going to be concerned about
>   where your binding for `open-database' is coming from.  

Oh yes, beyond WG2 I agree that module organization (or package organization,
where a package is a notional thing containing one or more modules) is the
only way to go.  But for WG1 it's mostly just bureaucratic.

-- 
John Cowan  cowan@x  http://ccil.org/~cowan
In the sciences, we are now uniquely privileged to sit side by side
with the giants on whose shoulders we stand.
        --Gerald Holton

_______________________________________________
Scheme-reports mailing list
Scheme-reports@x
http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports