Scheme language standardization process
On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 11:31 AM, Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x> wrote: > > [...] so without weighing the pros > and cons too heavily (4) stands out as possibly the safest > option. Sorry, I forgot to list the con that (4) results in the same problems for Chez, so disregard that conclusion. The best approach is far from obvious. I welcome additional pros and cons. -- Alex _______________________________________________ Scheme-reports mailing list Scheme-reports@x http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports