Re: [Scheme-reports] 5.1 programs

[Andy Wingo <wingo@x>]

On Fri 20 May 2011 07:17, Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x> writes:

>> Funally the result of invoking a continuation captured at the toplevel
>> is not mentioned.  On purpose?
>
> Yes.  Have you ever seen a sane proposal for specifying
> this that all implementations could easily support?! :O

No :)

Andy
-- 
http://wingolog.org/

_______________________________________________
Scheme-reports mailing list
Scheme-reports@x
http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports