Scheme language standardization process
On Sat, 30 Apr 2011 20:42:06 -0400, Vincent Manis <vmanis@x> wrote: > And apparently there is no way to produce a textual representation of a > complex number in polar form (other than writing a few lines of code > oneself). I'll have more to say about number->string in a subsequent > email, but this certainly seems to me to be a deficiency. WRITE and NUMBER->STRING should both do this. Both are required to produce the external representation of a number. If a number is polar, then it's external representation is in the real@real notation, and you will get that form. Aaron W. Hsu -- Programming is just another word for the lost art of thinking. _______________________________________________ Scheme-reports mailing list Scheme-reports@x http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports