Scheme language standardization process
Alex Shinn scripsit: > I love this reasoning. So every Scheme supports mixed exactness > quaternions. What a progressive language. Well, maybe so if we had standard procedures jmag-part and kmag-part for looking inside them. But anyway, my reasoning was wrong: some systems return 0 as the imag-part of an inexact real, whereas others return 0.0. I've collected the data and will be integrating it into ComplexRepresentations. -- John Cowan cowan@x http://ccil.org/~cowan You cannot enter here. Go back to the abyss prepared for you! Go back! Fall into the nothingness that awaits you and your Master. Go! --Gandalf _______________________________________________ Scheme-reports mailing list Scheme-reports@x http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports