Scheme language standardization process
I think that what was once named Snow will be handing that duty? http://lists.scheme-reports.org/pipermail/scheme-reports/2011-September/001494.html On Sat, Jan 14, 2012 at 11:08 AM, Roderic Morris <roderyc@x> wrote: > Has there been much discussion about this? I haven't found any on this > list (mostly because the only interface to the archive I found is > impossible to search), or much on the wiki. It seems absolutely > essential to any language where code is shared at large. If they've > been purposefully omitted, what sort of strategy would you expect > library writers / users to use instead? What should happen when a > program depends on libraries A and B, which both depend on library C, > but at different points in time, between which C has had substantial > changes in its interface? > > -Roderic > > _______________________________________________ > Scheme-reports mailing list > Scheme-reports@x > http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports -- http://www.wisdomandwonder.com/ ACM, AMA, COG, IEEE _______________________________________________ Scheme-reports mailing list Scheme-reports@x http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports