Scheme language standardization process
On Sat, 23 Apr 2011, Eli Barzilay wrote: > Andre suggests > removing them in their current form from the language which IMO is at > least as justified as not including `lazy'. Yes, my suggestion would be to remove them from the WG1 language. _______________________________________________ Scheme-reports mailing list Scheme-reports@x http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports