Re: [Scheme-reports] "include" filename resolution

["Arthur A. Gleckler" <scheme@x>]

And given that the latter will be popular for a while longer, it's
especially surprising that it's different from inside a module.  Given
that, it might make more sense to have it use the CWD when used on the
REPL, and throw a syntax error from inside a module.

I'm curious about what you mean by "... will be popular for a while longer...."  Is there some reason that REPLs are likely to fade from popularity?

Just curious.

_______________________________________________
Scheme-reports mailing list
Scheme-reports@x
http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports