Scheme language standardization process
John Cowan <cowan@x> writes: > Alaric Snell-Pym scripsit: > >> 1) Hashing objects not supported usefully by the usual hash function, >> such as things implemented as closures. > > Good luck with that. Unless you have magic (and non-portable) ways of > dissecting closures, of course. One can extract information about a closure by applying it. The most obvious example would be an object with getter and setter messages, implemented by a closure; although whether anyone would actually do that nowadays, since we have records, is beyond me. Taylan _______________________________________________ Scheme-reports mailing list Scheme-reports@x http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports