Scheme language standardization process
On 07/16/2013 12:19 AM, Marijn wrote: > If we could compare functions for equality, we could have the return > values be the respective equivalents of <, > and =. Failing that maybe > '<, '> and '= would be appropriate? For what it's worth, this is THE most compelling reason to allow equality-testing of functions IMO. Having functions as return values from ordering comparators would enable use of comparators as comparison functions, allowing some succinct functional idioms. Ray _______________________________________________ Scheme-reports mailing list Scheme-reports@x http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports