Re: [Scheme-reports] valid implementation of call-with-input-file?

To: "John Cowan" <cowan@x>, "Alex Shinn" <alexshinn@x>
Subject: Re: [Scheme-reports] valid implementation of call-with-input-file?
From: <xacc.ide@x>
Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2012 16:12:11 +0200
Cc: scheme-reports <scheme-reports@x>
Importance: Normal
In-reply-to: <20120823082624.GD984@mercury.ccil.org>
References: <20120819093805.GC22466@frohike.homeunix.org><CAMMPzYPMV4V2Xc53HrHHmKGfEcJsYdK33LsT7Fp_R4CwcXXbFA@mail.gmail.com><87lihagfqc.fsf@pobox.com><CAMMPzYMTV0fRy_MfH_dOaE_9EQ+ZKDjejdBU4iPFgRAQ-wPjpg@mail.gmail.com><87628dhmzi.fsf@pobox.com><CAMMPzYOp_5O-PGr4RJb8MH0W8w9pmvxz685k2WA1hJPf872ZBg@mail.gmail.com><87393gf4fn.fsf@pobox.com><CAMMPzYPqeEPetikdBZmJM4JLsjFPUKOp6KLb_sm=gsx_rg+3=g@mail.gmail.com><87y5l7cu78.fsf@pobox.com><CAMMPzYNkozZCwE1AXSy1SaRmXoTv7OEcVxM_oQp_PWZvfktNaQ@mail.gmail.com> <20120823082624.GD984@mercury.ccil.org>

> ... and IronScheme close the port.

Purely because of the lack of full continuations. Hence, I have that 
guarantee, and in fact implemented with dynamic-wind.

With more than just escape continuations, this is indeed a hairy issue.

Cheers

leppie



_______________________________________________
Scheme-reports mailing list
Scheme-reports@x
http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports

References:
- Re: [Scheme-reports] valid implementation of call-with-input-file?
  - From: Peter Bex <Peter.Bex@x>
- Re: [Scheme-reports] valid implementation of call-with-input-file?
  - From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
- Re: [Scheme-reports] valid implementation of call-with-input-file?
  - From: Andy Wingo <wingo@x>
- Re: [Scheme-reports] valid implementation of call-with-input-file?
  - From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
- Re: [Scheme-reports] valid implementation of call-with-input-file?
  - From: Andy Wingo <wingo@x>
- Re: [Scheme-reports] valid implementation of call-with-input-file?
  - From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
- Re: [Scheme-reports] valid implementation of call-with-input-file?
  - From: Andy Wingo <wingo@x>
- Re: [Scheme-reports] valid implementation of call-with-input-file?
  - From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
- Re: [Scheme-reports] valid implementation of call-with-input-file?
  - From: Andy Wingo <wingo@x>
- Re: [Scheme-reports] valid implementation of call-with-input-file?
  - From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
- Re: [Scheme-reports] valid implementation of call-with-input-file?
  - From: John Cowan <cowan@x>

Prev by Date: Re: [Scheme-reports] valid implementation of call-with-input-file?
Next by Date: Re: [Scheme-reports] new wording for eqv?
Previous by thread: Re: [Scheme-reports] valid implementation of call-with-input-file?
Next by thread: Re: [Scheme-reports] valid implementation of call-with-input-file?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread