Re: [Scheme-reports] Are generated toplevel definitions secret?

To: "Perry E. Metzger" <perry@x>
Subject: Re: [Scheme-reports] Are generated toplevel definitions secret?
From: "Perry E. Metzger" <perry@x>
Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2011 13:44:33 -0500
Cc: scheme-reports <scheme-reports@x>
In-reply-to: <20111107133937.6d7c4886@jabberwock.cb.piermont.com>
References: <BANLkTi=hSfKrHo13BUMP==SNPCX-+As0HQ@mail.gmail.com> <BANLkTi=kSqWZpF-fAPObreiuAf9FxPb85w@mail.gmail.com> <BANLkTik2QF-u=58SLtQDTTWnx6htQxhqXA@mail.gmail.com> <Pine.SOC.4.64.1104231824210.28912@oow.het.brown.edu> <Pine.SOC.4.64.1104231937340.28912@oow.het.brown.edu> <Pine.SOC.4.64.1104231943520.28912@oow.het.brown.edu> <Pine.SOC.4.64.1104231958300.28912@oow.het.brown.edu> <Pine.SOC.4.64.1104232007580.29811@oow.het.brown.edu> <op.vuk386b80p3ku8@localhost> <m3tydkou0p.fsf@unquote.localdomain> <op.vu4mwhax0p3ku8@localhost> <m3zkmhydtu.fsf@unquote.localdomain> <op.vvsiv8sw0p3ku8@localhost> <m3vcx4s6c3.fsf@unquote.localdomain> <op.vvz00wgq0p3ku8@localhost> <m3tycjn6sl.fsf@unquote.localdomain> <87ipmwdvap.fsf@pobox.com> <CAHwMy1-UdO10egVcDG4E0k4sN5KNxH0umRKLqhKTLd-dz1P+5A@mail.gmail.com> <8762ivexa8.fsf@pobox.com> <20111107133937.6d7c4886@jabberwock.cb.piermont.com>

On Mon, 7 Nov 2011 13:39:37 -0500 "Perry E. Metzger"
<perry@x> wrote:
> Isn't all of this precisely why de Brujin indexes were invented?

Eeep! That should be "de Bruijn" of course, though the link was
correct.

> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/De_Bruijn_index

Perry
-- 
Perry E. Metzger		perry@x

_______________________________________________
Scheme-reports mailing list
Scheme-reports@x
http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports

References:
- [Scheme-reports] ANN: first draft of R7RS small language available
  - From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
- Re: [Scheme-reports] ANN: first draft of R7RS small language available
  - From: OKUMURA Yuki <mjt@x>
- Re: [Scheme-reports] ANN: first draft of R7RS small language available
  - From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
- [Scheme-reports] Regions of imports unspecified
  - From: Andre van Tonder <andre@x>
- [Scheme-reports] What are regions of toplevel imports?
  - From: Andre van Tonder <andre@x>
- [Scheme-reports] EVAL
  - From: Andre van Tonder <andre@x>
- [Scheme-reports] What happened to (UNQUOTE <expression> ...)
  - From: Andre van Tonder <andre@x>
- [Scheme-reports] Are generated toplevel definitions secret?
  - From: Andre van Tonder <andre@x>
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Are generated toplevel definitions secret?
  - From: "Aaron W. Hsu" <arcfide@x>
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Are generated toplevel definitions secret?
  - From: Andy Wingo <wingo@x>
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Are generated toplevel definitions secret?
  - From: Andy Wingo <wingo@x>
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Are generated toplevel definitions secret?
  - From: "Aaron W. Hsu" <arcfide@x>
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Are generated toplevel definitions secret?
  - From: Andy Wingo <wingo@x>
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Are generated toplevel definitions secret?
  - From: Andy Wingo <wingo@x>
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Are generated toplevel definitions secret?
  - From: Jim Rees <jimreesma@x>
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Are generated toplevel definitions secret?
  - From: Andy Wingo <wingo@x>
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Are generated toplevel definitions secret?
  - From: "Perry E. Metzger" <perry@x>

Prev by Date: Re: [Scheme-reports] Are generated toplevel definitions secret?
Next by Date: Re: [Scheme-reports] Are generated toplevel definitions secret?
Previous by thread: Re: [Scheme-reports] Are generated toplevel definitions secret?
Next by thread: Re: [Scheme-reports] Are generated toplevel definitions secret?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread