Re: [Scheme-reports] initial results of implementor intentions poll

["Aaron W. Hsu" <arcfide@x>]

On Sun, 23 Oct 2011 02:34:43 -0400, John Cowan <cowan@x>  
wrote:

> I should think that the R6RS-only implementations would be able to
> implement most of R7RS-small using a common library, with just a
> little bit of code to accept define-library as equivalent to module.
> Writing such a common library would be a Worthy Thing.

Given the out-of-band nature of R6RS and R7RS libraries, this is not such  
an easy thing. You can't just slap a macro together for DEFINE-LIBRARY.

	Aaron W. Hsu

-- 
Aaron W. Hsu | arcfide@x | http://www.sacrideo.us

_______________________________________________
Scheme-reports mailing list
Scheme-reports@x
http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports