Re: [Scheme-reports] Proposed new SRFI for immutable lists

To: scheme-reports@x
Subject: Re: [Scheme-reports] Proposed new SRFI for immutable lists
From: vnikolov@x (Vassil Nikolov | Васил Николов)
Date: Mon, 01 Sep 2014 00:18:42 -0400
In-reply-to: <20140901025019.GF5424@mercury.ccil.org> (John Cowan's message of "Sun\, 31 Aug 2014 22\:50\:19 -0400")
Mail-followup-to: scheme-reports@x
Organization: #
References: <20140901025019.GF5424@mercury.ccil.org>

I wonder if it would be useful to have a
specialized means to check for or guard
against anomalies like the value of

  (cons 0 (cons 1 (ipair 2 (ipair 3 '()))))

and similar.

---Vassil.

-- 
Vassil Nikolov | Васил Николов | <vnikolov@x>

"My other car is an icar now."

_______________________________________________
Scheme-reports mailing list
Scheme-reports@x
http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports

References:
- [Scheme-reports] Proposed new SRFI for immutable lists
  - From: John Cowan <cowan@x>

Prev by Date: [Scheme-reports] Proposed new SRFI for immutable lists
Next by Date: Re: [Scheme-reports] Proposed new SRFI for immutable lists
Previous by thread: [Scheme-reports] Proposed new SRFI for immutable lists
Next by thread: Re: [Scheme-reports] Proposed new SRFI for immutable lists
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread