Scheme language standardization process
On Mon, 25 Apr 2011 01:52:15 -0400, Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x> wrote: > On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 3:17 AM, Andre van Tonder <andre@x> > wrote: >> The template pattern language on page 16 seems broken. >> >> It would allow the following template: >> >> (... a ...) > > Thanks, in some implementations this expands to (a ...), > but I think we should restrict the escape to the one > argument version. I'll update it to say the <pattern>s > and <template>s which are identifiers may not be the > <ellipsis>. Since <template> is already everything that <element> is except without the ellipsis, wouldn't it be easier to just change (<ellipsis> <element>) to (<ellipsis> <template>)? I can make this change if someone can confirm that this will fix the problem. Aaron W. Hsu -- Programming is just another word for the lost art of thinking. _______________________________________________ Scheme-reports mailing list Scheme-reports@x http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports