Scheme language standardization process
My feeling (which I don't feel strongly about): (string->number "#x10") ==> 16 (string->number "#x10" 8) ==> #f (string->number "#x10" 10) ==> #f I.e. if you specify a radix argument, then it's an error to have a radix prefix. If you don't specify a radix argument, then the default is 10, but a radix prefix is allowed, just as with read. -- --Per Bothner per@x http://per.bothner.com/ _______________________________________________ Scheme-reports mailing list Scheme-reports@x http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports