Scheme language standardization process
Alex Shinn scripsit: > > How is this different from hash-table-replace? > > Actually, it would appear to be equivalent to hash-table-extend!. Yes, what I meant. In Racket it's spelled ref!, but I felt that name was self-contradictory (a mutating accessor?!) -- And it was said that ever after, if any John Cowan man looked in that Stone, unless he had a cowan@x great strength of will to turn it to other http://ccil.org/~cowan purpose, he saw only two aged hands withering in flame. --"The Pyre of Denethor" _______________________________________________ Scheme-reports mailing list Scheme-reports@x http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports