Scheme language standardization process
On 01/21/11 09:25, David Rush wrote: > Are we really willing to go here? I'd be up for it, but I thought that > the community was shying away from radical changes through > standardization, and that deep innovation in the Scheme community was > supposed to be led by implementations. I agree... pattern matching would be lovely, but we'd be on shaky ground shoving it in now! Too much danger of implementations shaking their head at such a change, and skipping R7RS as many have skipped R6RS. > david ABS -- Alaric Snell-Pym http://www.snell-pym.org.uk/alaric/