Scheme language standardization process
Per Bothner scripsit: > "Problem" is a strange word in this context - that eqv? was defined > as equal? is irrelevant to what is happening (at least for Kawa). > The reason the result is #t is that (as you mention elsewhere): > implementations are free to make literal strings eqv? if they have > the same content. Oops, I forgot to control for that. The jury will disregard what I said. -- Real FORTRAN programmers can program FORTRAN John Cowan in any language. --Ed Post cowan@x _______________________________________________ Scheme-reports mailing list Scheme-reports@x http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports