Scheme language standardization process
On Thu, 23 Dec 2010, John Cowan wrote: > Nobody knows what "most" Scheme programmers need, hence the fairly large > set in WG2. If some turn out to go unimplemented or unused, they can be > removed in R8RS, since they are all optional. In any language aspiring to be taken seriously, it is quite difficult to take something out once in the standard. _______________________________________________ Scheme-reports mailing list Scheme-reports@x http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports