Re: [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports-wg1] Arthur Gleckler's rationales for 4th ballo votes

[Emmanuel Medernach <emmanuel.medernach@x>]

On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 8:56 AM, Denis Washington <denisw@x> wrote:

Am 31.08.2011 00:43, schrieb Arthur A. Gleckler:

> "r7rs-big" and "r7rs-small" are perfectly good names.

In my opinion, they are awful. What should the reports be named, then?
"The Small Report on [...] Scheme" and "The Big Report on [...] Scheme"?
Sounds like they are differently detailed reports on the same thing,
which is clearly not the case.

What about something like R6RS naming: "Report on the Scheme Core Language" and "Report on the Scheme Standard Libraries" ?  This naming highlights the fact of a core language (WG1) with optional libraries (WG2).

Best regards,
--
Emmanuel
_______________________________________________
Scheme-reports mailing list
Scheme-reports@x
http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports