Re: [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports-wg1] Arthur Gleckler's rationales for 4th ballo votes

["Arthur A. Gleckler" <scheme@x>]

So I'm not basing my argument against the "revision" term on some vague
notion of edit distance, but on the fact that the upcoming reports
present a substantial semantic restructuring in that they redefine what
Scheme actually is - a "language tower" rather than a single language,
if you will.

We've always had such ideas.  Earlier versions of the report identified certain features as optional, for example.  It's only a matter of degree.

_______________________________________________
Scheme-reports mailing list
Scheme-reports@x
http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports