Scheme language standardization process
On 09/06/2012 03:58 PM, Alex Shinn wrote:ity - > Chez modules cannot be implemented by every > other system, nor can Scheme48 modules, but > the R7RS define-library form can. Not to argue for or against "Chez-style" modules, but is this really meaningful? The point of R7RS is to specify and language, and so every other system that claims to modify R7RS would have to be *modified* to implemented the specification. I assume you mean that Chez modules are be so *fundamentally* different from other module systems that it would be need a huge and unreasonable re-write that it would not be reasonable for R7RS. -- --Per Bothner per@x http://per.bothner.com/ _______________________________________________ Scheme-reports mailing list Scheme-reports@x http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports