Scheme language standardization process
On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 5:33 AM, John Cowan <cowan@x> wrote: > This is a Formal Response to Formal Comment #435: > > Bytevectors should be called u8vectors > > Since the WG had already rejected this alternative, and since no new > arguments were provided in the Formal Comment, the editors rejected this > proposal without another ballot. It would have been consistent with our process not to bring this to a second vote, however out of respect to the commenter as a formal editor we did in fact vote on this a second time, emphasizing your arguments. Bytevector won by a smaller margin, but still won. -- Alex _______________________________________________ Scheme-reports mailing list Scheme-reports@x http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports