Re: [Scheme-reports] Is <bytevector> missed out from the list of pattern datum?

[John Cowan <cowan@x>]

Alex Shinn scripsit:

> Yes, it should be added to <pattern datum> as you say.

Added to both the errata page and the errata branch.

-- 
Principles.  You can't say A is         John Cowan <cowan@x>
made of B or vice versa.  All mass      http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
is interaction.  --Richard Feynman

_______________________________________________
Scheme-reports mailing list
Scheme-reports@x
http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports