Re: [Scheme-reports] Is <bytevector> missed out from the list of pattern datum?

[Yuichi Nishiwaki <yuichi.nishiwaki@x>]

Good to hear!

2013/12/2 John Cowan <cowan@x>:
> Alex Shinn scripsit:
>
>> Yes, it should be added to <pattern datum> as you say.
>
> Added to both the errata page and the errata branch.
>
> --
> Principles.  You can't say A is         John Cowan <cowan@x>
> made of B or vice versa.  All mass      http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
> is interaction.  --Richard Feynman

_______________________________________________
Scheme-reports mailing list
Scheme-reports@x
http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports