Scheme language standardization process
On Mon 02 May 2011 11:51, Alaric Snell-Pym <alaric@x> writes: > (EXCEPTION? foo) > (EXCEPTION->STRING foo) > ...and for advanced implementations, (EXCEPTION-BACKTRACE foo) etc... This assumes a mode of debugging after the stack is unwound, instead of debugging before throwing the exception. In the latter case, not only do you have the possibility to restart, you don't need to reify anything to have access to a backtrace. I don't think this is the sort of thing that a Scheme report should standardize. Andy -- http://wingolog.org/ _______________________________________________ Scheme-reports mailing list Scheme-reports@x http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports