Scheme language standardization process
On Mon 02 May 2011 11:51, Alaric Snell-Pym <alaric@x> writes: > Yes, I think that would be good to fix. However, I'm not too upset that > it's not defined in WG1, as it looks like the sort of thing that will > emerge as a de-facto standard after some trial and error, and then be > standardised in R8RS or similar. An aside: it really would be nice to change our report naming convention. "Scheme 7", "Scheme 8", etc sound much better. Andy -- http://wingolog.org/ _______________________________________________ Scheme-reports mailing list Scheme-reports@x http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports