Scheme language standardization process
On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 12:02 PM, John Cowan <cowan@x> wrote: > Alex Shinn scripsit: > >> Sure, you can change your mind about what you think is good for WG2, >> but you can't retroactively change the vote. Pending a proper WG2 >> vote, the WG1 members must act under the assumption that WG2 will have >> R6RS-style blobs only. > > Actually it's the other way around: what WG2 voted for was "homogenous > numeric arrays", without specifying how they would be implemented. > See http://tinyurl.com/wg2-ballot. Exactly, the WG2 votes were simply for broad topics. The WG1 vote was for a very specific proposal and would take precedence. But we're free to change our minds in WG2. -- Alex _______________________________________________ Scheme-reports mailing list Scheme-reports@x http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports